|
The information
provided below is general in nature and thus, may not apply to your situation.
Before relying on this information, you should consult with your legal
and/or tax professional.
Generally, the first contract in any real estate transaction is
the Seller's listing agreement with his or her real estate agent.
This contract promises a fee, typically a percentage of the sales
price, to the real estate agent if the agent can find a Buyer who
will meet the Seller's terms.
Agent's Fee. The agents fee is negotiable. Six percent of
the sales price has been the norm. But, remember, the fee is negotiable.
In some really slow markets agents are willing to reduce their commission
to as low as five percent. A fixed fee is also acceptable. You might
also want to consider offering a reduced guaranteed fee. With this
option, the agent gets paid an amount less than normal, but the
fee is earned even if you later decide not to sell. For instance,
a six percent commission on a $600,000 property would be $36,000.
You offer a guaranteed $24,000 commission. It is less than the agent
would have made on the sale, but it's guaranteed. Guaranteeing payment
to the agent makes room for a lot of agent compromise. You will
not find much agent flexibility with a major real estate house.
The agents with their own office make their own decisions whereas
the larger offices have rules written in stone.
The Listing Term.
The listing term is also negotiable. The agent wants a long term to
insure he or she will make a commission. The buyer wants a short term,
which can always be extended if the agent performs well. Three to four
months is generally a good listing term. Remember, it can always be extended.
Other agreements:
If your agent has agreed to do certain things during the listing,
such as an open house every three weeks, the listing agreement should
recite this agreement. If there is an agreement about sharing marketing
costs, that should also be included.
Dual agency: The
listing agreement is also the place to include agency agreements. For
instance, if you have decided in advance that you do not want your agent
also representing the buyer, the listing agreement should prohibit the
listing agent from also representing the buyer. It is all up to you. If
you decide to allow your listing agent to act as a dual agent representing
both buyer and seller, you may want the listing agreement to designate
reduced commission to your agent in the event of dual agency.
Exclusivity of
Listings: Listings are typically "exclusive," meaning that
the agent gets a commission regardless of whether the agent's efforts
produced the buyer. For instance, if the seller sells to a relative, the
agent gets a commission. If the seller has a potential buyer, he should
exclude that person in the listing agreement. The reason for exclusivity
is to insure the agent a commission for the work he or she puts into the
listing. Personally, I feel that listing agreements are drawn to favor
the agent and should provide more flexibility. For instance, if it is
clear that the buyer is brought in by the seller and not by the agent's
marketing, the agent should not get the entire commission. Half of the
commission would be an equitable split.
Multiple Listing
Services. Your agent will typically list the property with the local
multiple listing service, which then disseminates information about the
property to all the other agent members of that multiple listing service.
If you feel your property would also have interest in multiple listing
services in other areas, ask your agent to also list the property in the
non-local service.
Sometimes large real estate offices market a listing within their offices
before they put the listing on the multiple listing service. This
enables one office to enjoy the full commission if they can produce
a buyer before the listing reaches the public domain. This practice
of obtaining in-house offers may not be in the seller's best interest
since it deprives the listing of full market exposure with the possibility
of above-listing offers. Thus, in the Listing Agreement specify
that the listing is not be held and is to be placed on the multiple
listing service immediately.
A written offer is
made by the buyer on a form typically called a Deposit Receipt and Purchase
Offer. The seller may counter the offer or accept. If he or she accepts,
the offer becomes their binding contract containing all the parties' rights
and obligations. If the seller responds with other terms, a counter offer
is presented. Once the parties are in agreement on ALL terms, the contract
becomes binding.
Both the buyer and seller should carefully read every term - whether standard,
fine print or written in -- and understand each consequence before signing
the contract. The standard form contracts used these days, except for
CAR's contract, are well-written and easy to understand. The time frames
set and obligations of each party are stated in a succinct manner. Reading
the contract will give you a complete understanding of all details of
the contract.
Normally the offer
has at least two contingencies - the financing contingency and physical
inspection contingency. Contingencies give one party the legal right to
back out of a contract. During the time that the contingencies are in
place, the contract is conditional and the seller cannot bank on the contract
closing. During this time, however, the seller cannot accept another offer
in primary position even if the price is higher than the conditional offer
he has accepted. The seller may accept the new offer in back up position
and if the contract in first position cancels, the back up moves into
first position. It is, therefore, essential to carefully consider the
market and the prospective offer before accepting any offer.
The parties must be very careful about insuring that the contingency deadlines
are followed. The buyer must either terminate the contract during the
contingency period or release the contingency by the end of the contingency
period. Many contracts require the seller to give the buyer a 24-hour
notice demanding release of contingencies before the contract lapses and
the seller moves on to market the property for sale again.
Financing Contingency:
Usually the Buyer needs a loan to purchase the property. If he cannot
qualify, the financing contingency is the buyer's escape clause. Since
the Seller ties up the property for the financing contingency period,
waiting to see if the Buyer qualifies, the qualified buyer presents a
pre-approval letter from his lender with his offer or within a very brief
time after the offer is accepted. The pre-approval letter confirms that
the lender has already qualified the buyer, and all that now needs qualification
is the property itself by appraisal. In a seller's market, seller's want
to make sure buyers are pre-approved. Make sure the wording of the lender
letter is "pre-approved", not "pre-qualified". The
latter means nothing. With pre-qualification the lender has not even confirmed
the information provided by the buyer.
A typical financing
contingency is 30 days. 21 days is considered a short loan approval period,
but lenders can often meet this timeframe as long as the lending market
is not over extended. The loan contingency should specifically describe
the loan the buyer is seeking. In essence, the buyer is saying that if
I get the loan I describe, my loan contingency will be considered met.
Therefore, the seller should insure that the loan terms described by the
buyer conforms to what the market will bear. For instance, buyer's loan
contingency reads:
"This contract
is contingent upon the buyer obtaining an 80% loan at a 7.5% fixed rate
payable over 30 years, buyer to pay no more than one point in fees, within
30 days of acceptance of this contract."
Make sure that the
buyer's pre-approval letter matches these terms. Since the buyer is already
pre-approved for this loan, there is very little chance the transaction
will fail to close because of loan approval. Of course, if the property
fails to appraise at the purchase price, the loan will not receive full
approval. But, other than that, there are few conditions that prevent
full loan approval from being given when the buyer has been pre-approved.
Property Inspection
Contingency: During the inspection contingency period, the buyer evaluates
the physical condition of the property. During this time, the buyer receives
and carefully reviews the seller's disclosures about the property's conditions
and its history. The buyer also hires professionals to investigate the
property. The typical inspections performed by the buyer are pest control
(relates only to pest-related conditions) and home inspection (the condition
of the property unrelated to pests). Other inspections the buyer may want
to have performed are roof (the home inspection does not include roof
inspection), mold, windows, siding, foundation, engineering. The extent
of your inspection will naturally depend upon the characteristics of the
property itself, the value of the property and your desire to be thorough.
Buyers should be present at their inspections in order to ask questions
and make sure the inspector does not find an area to be "inaccessible."
For instance, if an area has boxes or furniture in the way, the inspector
will not inspect that area, instead listing it as "inaccessible".
If you are present, with the seller's permission, areas that are inaccessible
should be made accessible. It is often in these "inaccessible"
areas where problems exist. There may be areas where some intrusion is
required to investigate non-apparent conditions such as pests, mold, water
entry, and the like. You and the seller should be on hand to authorize
these intrusions.
The inspection contingency
should be as short as possible since during this period the buyer may
cancel the contract based on any physical condition of the property. Typically,
a 14-day inspection period is given. If the buyer can show that he or
she needs longer, the contingency may be extended.
Sellers should carefully
read the contract provision relating to this contingency. Pest reports
often break down defects into two categories - Section 1 defects (actual
damage) and Section 2 defects (likely to lead to pest damage). Some contract
have the seller agreeing in advance to pay for Section 1 defects. The
seller probably wants to wait to see what the inspections say before agreeing
to pay for any defects that are later discovered. Thus, if the contract
includes this provision, the seller will generally want to remove it.
Contingent on Sale
of Buyer's Home or Purchase of Seller's New Home: There is nothing
more stressful than selling a home without a new home to move to or buying
a home when you haven't sold your home. There are contingencies to cover
these situations. Whether these contingencies will be accepted depend
on the type of market that is present. In a strong seller's market, a
seller will not accept an offer with a contingency that the buyer must
first sell his or her home. In a strong buyer's market, the buyer will
not allow the seller's contingency that a replacement home must be found
before escrow can close.
The problem with this type of contingency is that once the seller accepts
a contract, the property becomes less marketable in the multiple listings.
It is then shown as a sale pending. Although it does show that it is subject
to this type of contingency, the property nevertheless loses interest
because of its status as pending. Because of this fact, the seller wants
the contingency to be as short and as specific as possible.
The wording of these
contingencies in most form contracts is not sufficient to cause the contingency
to operate in the best manner to assure sale of the property. Many contracts
provide that if the seller receives another offer he or she wants to accept,
the buyer is given notice and must release the contingency within 72 hours
to stay in contract. This provision is reasonable. The rest of the contingency
should be as tight as possible. The contingency should state that within
____ days the buyer/seller must be in contract subject only to loan and
inspection contingencies (and not subject to either party buying or selling
properties), and removal of contingencies on the other sale to occur within
14 days thereafter for the physical inspection contingency and within
21 days thereafter for the loan contingency. It is only in this manner
that the parties can best control their own sale process.
These lawfully required
disclosures are the most important aspect of the transaction for the seller.
Sellers are required to disclose conditions "that materially affect
the value and desirability of the property." What does that mean?
It means disclose everything you know about the property. There is a long
list of disclosure forms that are legally required to be given to the
buyer by the seller.
The most important
is the Transfer Disclosure Statement (TDS) and its supplement. On these
forms the seller must disclose all conditions that "affect the value
and desirability of the property". This duty is broadly worded to
extend beyond the property itself. You should therefore describe conditions
known to you that are not within the boundaries of the property. This
means neighbors, visiting varmints, and any other situation that would
affect a reasonable person who lives at your property. If the disclosure
forms do not contain a question relating to the condition at hand, you
must describe it anyway. Make sure your written disclosures include everything.
Finally, the seller must disclose if anyone died on the property within
the last three years.
In a real estate transaction,
the seller should always take precautions against being sued by his or
her buyer. The seller's only duty to the buyer is to disclose, as described
above. If the buyer later decides to look to the seller for liability,
the attorney for the buyer meticulously reviews the seller's disclosure
statements attempting to match up the condition the buyer is complaining
of with the seller's failed or incomplete disclosure. If the condition
is something you knew about and if it is not listed in your written disclosures,
you are liable. The answer, then, is always to DISCLOSE, DISCLOSE, DISCLOSE.
The problem with seller
liability is the statute of limitations. In some situations, the buyer
can sue the seller as long as four years after the buyer discovers the
condition that was not disclosed. The buyer may not even discover the
condition for years and years after escrow closes, and then he has as
much as four more years to sue you. Thus, potential liability to the buyer
for non-disclosure can lurk for a long time into the future.
There are also further
disclosures required by any owner of a common interest property. One form
is completed by the owner while the other form is sent to the managing
association. The association completes its disclosures and produces association
documents including CC&Rs for the seller to transmit to the buyer.
An "as is"
sale means different things to different people. Legally, the seller still
has the same duty he or she has in an "as is" sale - to disclose
conditions that materially affect the value or desirability of the property.
"As is" is actually just a restatement of the law. Unless the
property sold is new, the property is always sold "as is". The
seller does not warrant any condition of the property; thus, the duty
of inspection and evaluation is on the buyer.
Seller BEWARE - there
are some standard form contracts that include a provision whereby the
seller warrants some conditions of the property. Read the contract carefully
and if that provision is included, make sure you have considered it carefully
- or remove the provision.
Sometimes what is
meant by "as is" is the seller will not credit the buyer for
physical conditions the buyer discovers in his or her inspections. This
understanding is something that has evolved within the real estate industry,
but there is no law adopting this definition. The buyer still has the
physical inspection contingency if it is set up in the contract, and if
there are conditions the buyer does not approve of or if the buyer seeks
a credit from the seller and the seller is unwilling to give it, the buyer
may cancel the contract. Because of the differing understandings of "as
is", if "as is" becomes part of a sale, the agents and
the parties should clearly describe at the start what they mean by "as
is".
Liquidating damages
means that the parties have agreed to the amount the SELLER will collect
from the BUYER if the buyer fails to close after removing his contingencies.
If the seller defaults, the liquidated damages provision does not apply.
The buyer may sue the seller for damages or specific performance (the
property) if the seller defaults. Thus, the liquidated damages provision
only applies in the event of buyer default.
When the parties agree
to liquidated damages, the Seller may retain the buyer's deposit, typically
3% of the purchase price, and cannot sue for additional amounts for the
Buyer's breach of the contract without cause. From the Buyer's perspective,
liquidated damages fixes his downside risk. The most he loses is his deposit.
From the Seller's perspective it fixes the amount he may recover from
his defaulting buyer and thereby simplifies the seller's action against
his buyer.
Although the parties
have agreed to liquidate (fix) their damages, the seller is not automatically
entitled to just scoop up the buyer's escrow deposit. Instead, the seller
has to prove in court, or arbitration if the parties so agreed, that the
buyer legally defaulted on the purchase.
The Liquidated Damages
Clause must be initialled by each party or it does not apply. And, when
the buyer makes his or her increased deposit, a liquidated damages ratification
must be signed for that deposit to apply toward liquidated damages.
Provided to replace
the overworked court system for a beleaguered public, mediation and arbitration
are the two most popular forums for resolving legal disputes outside of
the court system.. The standard real estate contract includes provisions
for mediation and arbitration. These provisions must be initialed by both
buyer and seller to apply to the parties' transaction.
The purpose of mediation
and arbitration is quick resolution and minimal expense. Achieving these
two goals is reason enough to join the alternative dispute resolution
(ADR) club. Time and money are two of our most valued commodities. But
equally important is conservation of energy for our valued interests.
If freed up, the vast amount of personal energy funneled into litigation
can make a far more meaningful contribution to our lives. Thus, ADR serves
a threefold purpose: saving time, money, and energy.
Binding arbitration
entirely replaces the court system and the appeal hierarchy. Parties agreeing
to binding arbitration no longer have access to the court or appellate
system.
The Difference
Between Mediation and Arbitration
Arbitration has been
around for a long time. People know it. Mediation is relatively new. For
this reason, these two processes are often confused. The truth is, mediation
and arbitration couldn't be more different.
The purpose of both
processes is quick resolution and minimal expense. Mediation is a voluntary
process; the parties make their own decisions. Binding arbitration is
an adversarial process. An arbitrator, usually a lawyer, retired judge
or industry expert well versed in the topic of the case, decides who wins
and who loses and renders an award. Arbitration is a far better forum
than the court system, because it streamlines the legal process. It terminates
the dispute, one way or the other, quickly and at a relatively minimal
expense. It allows the parties to move on.
The biggest difference
between the two processes is that mediation does not result in a decision,
order, or judgment imposed on the parties. Even when required by contract,
mediation is a settlement process and involves no decision making, other
than the parties' decision to settle or not. Mediation is a no-fault,
voluntary process that leaves the parties in charge of their case. Therefore
the mediation process does not place blame; it is a means to settlement.
Arbitration, on the other hand, is combat. It yields a decision by the
arbitrator against one party in the form of an award.
When You Mediate,
You Determine the Outcome
Often, parties confusing
mediation with arbitration arrive at the mediation session ready to do
battle, when they should be prepared to work toward settlement. This combative
attitude impedes the mediation process, which must be approached with
conciliation and resolve to succeed.
With mediation, the
participants create and abide by their own settlement. It is true that
the mediator facilitates, encourages, and directs the process. But no
one makes decisions for the parties as a judge, jury, or arbitrator would.
Instead, with the mediator's assistance the parties cooperatively and
voluntarily determine their own outcome. They walk away from a mediation
session knowing they have made their own decisions and resolved their
matter in a conscious, intelligent manner. They are doubly satisfied.
And usually mediation occurs early on, before the money and energy drain
of the legal process has left its mark.
The Road After
Mediation-Arbitration
Another distinction
lies in the options available after mediation-arbitration. With mediation,
if the case doesn't settle you still have litigation ahead of you - either
in the court system or by binding arbitration if you have a binding arbitration
agreement. Mediation does not replace any procedure; it just adds a valuable
settlement step before litigation.
Arbitration, on the
other hand, is an adversarial, mandatory process that puts the arbitrator
in charge of the dispute. The parties give the arbitrator exclusive power
to determine the winner and loser. The judge and jury of the court system
is replaced with the arbitrator who makes a decision against one party
and in favor of the other. The arbitrator's decision carries the same
weight as a decision rendered in the court system. Thus, arbitration is
combat in every sense. Each party is there to be determined winner or
loser in legally enforceable black and white.
When the parties
depart from the arbitration hearing, they leave with a judgment or receive
it within a month. It is the ultimate and only decision. They are bound
by it. When the mediation participants leave the mediation, hopefully
they have signed a settlement agreement setting forth the terms they agreed
to. Otherwise, they leave without a settlement, and with all their legal
rights to proceed. One way or the other, their legal process is concluded
or they are a step closer to conclusion.
The information provided above is general in nature and thus,
may not apply to your situation. Before relying on this information,
you should consult with your legal and/or tax professional.
|